Visit our September 2015 Archive Web Site


Inve$tor Tran$parency





2160 Judge Jamieson Way

Viera, FL 32940 




From the aspect of the Patents Four Benchmarks & the Universal Grid that can be brought  to the Equity Market Place on a Weekly Basis 


 All Made Probable to Measure Change by a Quotient from Hours Paid to Employees in a Grid Format as Patented that Renders Certainity to Total Results


The Financial Markets (Barron's) did not accept an Absolute Percent (AB$%) that SCORES the Trading Value of a Stock & a Basket of Stocks  with an Hourly Benchmark with a Single Percent from .1% to 100%+, because the Absolute Percent means less trading.  Well here is another reduction of trading   

Another  12 day Stock variance cycle has just been completed as of last Friday by the Patented Grid with AXP the leader as in chart 1 & Purchased by Yours Truly this day 

A Stock Price , A Currency Exchange Rate, Net Sales Dollars &

Cash Receipts for Banks & Any Business 

Have Been Given Arithmetic Certaintly in

An Accounting Sense by 100% with the same Patent that brings SCORING to Investors with the AB$% Every Time you see a Stock Price  

AND 100% IS NEVER WRONG on Chart 2  

    A dictionary defines predict-to make known beforehand, prophesy, to tell what will happen. Brief & to the point with no mention of numbers or an amount. While "premonition" is the presentation of the future. Again no mention of numbers or a calculation for a cause or effect. How do I know exact Stock Price predictions have never been done before? It would not be kept a secret. Weather temperature predictions come close with their calculation, but have too many variables. I have only one variable-the actual price times 1000 shares for my stock predictions. Take a look at chart 3 below in Grid Format as Patented.

    I am not saying any Prediction proves itself, but 100% in chart 2 is worth notice.  I am saying  that I know the exact variance up and/or down  versus other Dow stock price predictions in Grid Format. The comparison to other stocks up or down in the same time frame is the KEY to tracking "before trading" for me that is currently also available to subscribers for the 30 Dow Stocks on a regular basis  via tab 3.  


Saturday's Postings will be for weekly  continuity of the website & future fee construction alla Barron's  for AB$% Scoring & Ranking as in chart 6 on this Tab as a futher data source for subscribers on the same day  


Let me  define another First for a  Stock Price weather standing alone or as an average for a  Basket of Stocks 

SCORE-the winning points in a competitition or game

The first being as a Percent (%) for the Trading Value as Closed Each Day on the NYSE  

That is Chart 6   


As Chart #6 is a "Data New" Version of the DJIA ranked with three patented variables B, C & D:


Col B) Closing Price per Share of a Corporation’s Public Stock


Col C) an Hourly Benchmark #3 for the Paid Hours of the Corporation


Col D) the ROI percent for the Quarterly OiBiTDA Dollars (CPA’s Cash Profit) of the same Corporation


Col E)  Shares per $1000 Traded and/or Invested


Col F)  is the Absolute Percent (AB$%®) the Single Trademark for Each Corporation with ranges from .1% to over 100% that individually ranks Each Corporation from high absolutes to the lowest with three patented variables plus the most important driver never used for the financial marekts before: the quantity of shares per $1000 invested or traded.


Column G Uses Intel (INTC chart 3) as its example. The Patent’s Earned versus Paid Hours component of two Patents fixes 13,000 shares with 13,000 Paid Hours for 12 days trading at $52.73 per share for TRADING VALUE OR $52,730 before a 12 day cycle starts as a Quotient. (extreme lower left corner for growth  measurement purposes). 


Therefore 13,000 / Total Trading Value  $52,730 =.24654 at the very top of the chart. 


Therefor .24654 is the Quoient Probable of INTC for 1000 Shares no matter how many are traded  for 12 more Days of Value or $685,490 in total Trading Value for the next 12 days. At the lower left hand of the chart for the entire 13 day duration.  Chart 3   

 Proving the Arithmetic Certainty of Grid Totals with Postings of 13 weeks within the Patents 


Sales certanity for any Business is easy because numbers are backed by bookkeeping or accounting operating statements prepared. Using the sales of the prior quarter & knowing the percent deviation from it all during the quarter is just short of predicting; better known as Actual by confiirming results for accounting purposes. Attaching such sales to Payroll Paid Hours are further enhanced as Patented by Gross Payroll Paid that can easily be. confirmed by the  IRS as a 3rd party with the addition of PAID HOURS as submitted.  


After done for the first time quarterly the data becomes routine & powerful as Quarter to Date Actual with many comparatives among Corporate Products, other businesses & competition.  Especially powerful because such data has never been gathered Quater to Date before over a consistent period of accounting time; also a Quarter.  The 13th week uses plug amounts that are in agreement with Net Sales Dollars and OiBiTDA Dollars of Operating Statements submitted to the SEC each Quarter.


In addition  13 week totals are reconciled to the penny for Payroll & to the Dollars  of Operating results with the prior Quarter as Patented for Benchmark #1 Sales, Benchmark #2 Payroll & Bx #3 OiBiTDA with percents  relative to 100%, Including the trading value of a stock by Paid Hours know as ROI & column D above.


The charts below summarize & pinpoints the methodology and accuracy for each Dow Stock by taking the Gross Trading Value of a Stock for a Fixed 13,000 Hours & 13,000 Shares X with a  Quotient for Each.


Here-to-for never given individuality to Investors collectively as in all Funds & Portfolios.

With the Growth Ranking of 31 stocks for another 12 day cycle 



 Chart 4, 5, & 6,  Only 4 is posted Daily with the DJIA in its Prediction Mode along with its comparison with All the Outstanding Shares & the D Curve Model as allocated to $25 million from all outstanding shares. 


Sorry for the size of the chart it should be printed out for the full prespective & how immaterial the daily hype without mix from an equal number of shares for each Stock.  


The DJIA should be Junked 

It is self fulfilling to large increases & declines as adjusted to cost for each stock 

With the 1st Question to the SEC 

Why is DIA ETF at $20 Trillion plusx when 

ALL of US Corporation's Cap Values are $30 Trillion Prox & ALL Outstanding  of the the Dow 30 is at $6 Trillion?

It is on a cloud with  a self-adjusting amount  of Direct Shareholders  chart 4 


    Exchanging lower price stocks into the Dow Index (DIA ETF Index) means that the size of the latter limits the percent of growth potential by getting less per $1000 for the stocks exchanged. An exchanger is giving up direct ownership in a corporation for cloud concocted indirect ownership. As experienced this week on February 9 there was a 1033-point decline in the DIA ETF Index Fund on that trading day.  That decline dictated a reduction to the equal number of shares for each, regardless of what particular price move each stock made that same day. Because the price base for that day is reporting change for the future, when the cost on that particular base day for each corporation at that price per share.  That cost is conformed on audit dates of April 30 and October 30 when filed with the SEC two months after the date. And confirmed as to fact for the DJIA INDEX at $24.9 trillion today February 9 when all outstanding shares are $6.5 trillion the same day.  


     I believe the Dow Jones was created for a means to invest in the most stable & consistent corporations from which it took the roll of an economic indicator all these years. And we all know since the last presidential election and before the 666, 1176 & 1033 drops during the Feb. 9 week price per share had nothing to do with the operations of one company let alone all 30. Per experts the market is always looking into the future. Not one of the 30 is going grow bottom line operations 25%, let alone 40%.


   My d 30 Curve (d for D’Amico) was created as a Portfolio. Because the 30 were in my mind as stable & consistent at the outset for the embodiment of my ROI ability in the first patent for Portfolios. During my commercializing phase I said what should be done for which there has been no success.


     Although ROI made sense for comparing Portfolios of stocks. Such did not make sense for “stock prices when UP equated to less ROI. It took a while and borrowing from the Bond Market that measures daily change by inverting the ROI of $100 invested. Thus, the Absolute Percent as Trademark AB$%® because I knew I had the answer for comparing Public Stocks, All Portfolios and most importantly Public Funds for $1000 Invested. The principal driver for all currencies because Benchmark #3 as in my Patents is in dollars & cents.    


   The next problem became the Cap Values themselves where past investors knowing a lower price per share is less risk. That is still the case as handled by splits where by the split rate does not upset overall cap value while it proportionately Increases the ROI of the Investment while still being more attractive at a lower price. Some Equity giants still have not gotten that message where to be the biggest one on the block is the desire.


    Smaller did attract my attention in another way. When observing the number of outstanding shares of 30 Corporation going from billions down to millions. All should not be equal in an Economic Indicator thus the proportion to different shares in a Portfolio going from billion to thousands and $25,000,000 in cap Values. Easily to assimilate understanding & practicality as in other charts of this web-site.


    Practicability came to the AB$%® when I FIXED Earned versus Paid Hours at 100% as in Technology B of the same Patents for Sales Dollars.  The Universal Grid as exactly duplicated from the patent text, took the price times 13 for 1000 shares times 1000 for 13 weeks of TOTAL TRADING VALUE as a substitute for a facility’s Sales Dollars.  Fixing the Quotient every 13 weeks for every other trading day allowed me to report price changes within 25-day cycles as daily changes Earned versus those paid as Fixed at 169,000 (13000 x 13000)


     Such 13-week arithmetic TOTALS allowed me record the ACTUAL price variation of each stock Dow stock price as the 30 happen via the closing of the NYSE over a Single Base Price for each as they accumulate in the Grid.    Such is now the case for contributing a 6th variable above in the first chart above 1) Price, 2) Price per $1000, 3) Benchmark #3, 4) ROI  5) Absolute Percent that Ranks by comparison to all other Public Stocks when available 6) Rate of most recent change versus the same time frame as the other 30 stocks. There-by not having to trade to or from another nor borrow for in a margin account until a trend becomes more obvious.


    The 7th variable that has been an impediment to all Equity Investing seemingly all these years is…..The exact Quantity of shares for each stock component in any BASKET of Public stocks.  Higher consistent Corporate ROI investment quantities will enhance your chances of your own basket’s success.   




 Chart 7 APPlE


 This is the Grand Slam out of the park homerun and around the world with 3 Benchmarks that arithmetically report

Payroll Cost as a Percent of Sales  Weekly

The Operating Certifier 




In all my attempts to commercialize my patents I could never get to the point of discussing this worldwide phenomenon for 3 Weekly Benchmarks from the Patents as so stated WITHIN THE PATENTS AS BELOW


Column 18 line 42

“An important part of the invention is to create a grid with these headings where week # of the quarter, with Sales (for the week), (units sold or transactions or invoices per week), Per Unit, Hours Paid (employee hours), Cash Profit (OiBiT Dollars), Hours Earned (sales and/units), (price variances versus the prior quarter), (volume variances verses the last quarter) (payroll dollars with or without fringes)”.

As Earmarked by Four Benchmarks (line 52)

      Bx 1 Sales Per Hour

      Bx 2 Labor Cost per Hour

      Bx 3 OiBiTDA per Hour

      Bx 4 Earnings per Share per Hour


Column 34 line 34

Claim 6 The method of claim1, wherein the steps of determining efficiency of the workforce of the first company and the second company each includes the step of  calculating the efficiency of the workforce by sales data per week, number of hours of paid salary people and number of hours  of hourly people


Column 5 line 33  An example of determining total employee hours in a quarter will now be describedSalary personnel by a fixed 40 hours per week is added to hourly people and the hours they get paid in that quarter.


Not all of Patent A & B Technology is of SEC interest, concern,  accuracy and confirmation of facts even though related to the price of  stock as stated and presented above. It takes the 6th claim of the 1st Patent 8,219,479 to bring home a fact not related to the price per share. But to raising cash with the help of employees REPORTABLE for entire world. More simply stated with the key word actual:


The Quarter to Date Actual Payroll Cost in Dollars & Cents as an Actual Rate per Paid Hour is  computed by the Actual Sales/Revenue Dollars Quarter to Date  with a Percent of Efficiency to those same Dollars in the Current Quarter as compared to every facility regardless to where the Entity  is located. 

    Payroll Efficiency or Lack of Weekly as a Percent of Sales
             The Operating Certifier    Per Paid
      Bx #2 Payroll per Paid Hour   $      12.363  $       12.363
      Bx # 1 Sales Earned per Hour  $      93.750 Hour
  Payroll In Efficiency 13.3%  
            Per Earned Hour  $    14.256
      as divided 86.7%





President Trump this little cut-out & below is the answer to where to take advantage of less Payroll Cost  by  attaching Sales Dollars to the analysis & where they take place 


Little did I know in the 1970’s when I compared Hours Paid to those Earned so much would be derived from so little. Such was from a manufacturing cost system for a Division under my controllership.  So much, being the Quotient when divided by the Net Sales Dollars or cash receipts of the Previous Quarter.